RIL stock skids 66% in the downturn

CHENNAI: From August '07 to January '08 when stocks rallied from strength to strength, Reliance Industries was the catalyst for the the 7,000-point sensex rally. But, ever since the fall started since January 10, it is again Reliance, according to data, may be the chief reason for bringing the benchmark down in the quicker and sharper downturn.
The world may have changed for Indian stocks and Sensex may have come down substantially but the the most influential stock in the 30-share bellwether index -Reliance still remains the match-maker. While the stock price has corrected by Rs 2,000 a share, Sensex came down by 12,500 points.

Extrapolating this, it is fair to say that for every one rupee shed by Reliance stock, Sensex has fallen by close to 6 points, according to analysts. When sensex went up by 49% in just 7 months (August to January) Reliance, which carried a weightage of 15.3% in early January, witnessed its stock price outperform the benchmark index and raised by 73%.

While the DLF stock went up by over 90% in the same period, the real estate company carried a meagre sensex weightage of 2%.

The impact of Reliance's rise is significant on Sensex as blue-chip firms SBI, ITC, ADAG-controlled Reliance Comm and ONGC cumulatively held a weightage of close to Reliance"s 15% in January. "The Reliance stock is pivotal to sensex's fortunes. There has hardly been any day, when Reliance has fallen and has not pulled down sensex alongwith it. Nobody remains unaffected when the big boy falls," said a large broker at Bombay Stock Exchange.

During the downturn, the Reliance stock has fallen by 66%, again outperforming Sensex which has shed 59% in the same period.

Although Sensex constituents such as RCom, Larsen & Toubro and DLF have fallen by 75-80% in the same period, which is sharper than Reliance, the three stocks have a cumulative weightage of just under 10% (which is less than Reliance's 12% influence), data shows.

One half of all Sensex companies taken together i.e around 15 stocks have just the same influence that a single scrip has: Reliance. DLF may have corrected by over 80% but Reliance's freefloat market cap is 14 times more than it. "Sensex is calculated under free-float market capitalisation method.

This means that the influence of closely-held companies such as DLF on the index is preventing even if their stock price fall is much sharper," the research head of a foreign brokerage explained.

Should Apple lose sleep over Google phone?

In the 15 months since it introduced the first iPhone, Apple has radically changed our expectations for mobile phones. But the rest of the industry isn't standing still. We're likely to see a fresh round of innovation as T-Mobile rolls out the first handset based on Google's Android operating system. And Research In Motion is fiercely defending its mobile e-mail turf with very good new products. Of the two, outsider Google faces the tougher challenge. But based on a preliminary look at the T-Mobile G1, announced on Sept. 23, launching in the U.S. and Europe in late October, I'd say it has a shot.

Apple set this whole competition in motion by building a single, excellent phone within an ecosystem that it controls totally, including the right to approve all third-party software. In contrast, Google is pushing an open platform, meaning any handset manufacturer can design hardware that runs Android. The closest relative to Android is Windows Mobile, which remains awkward to use after a decade of tweaking by Microsoft.

I spent only about an hour with the G1 ($180 with two-year contract; unlimited data plans start at $25), which is co-branded by Google and handset maker HTC. Disappointingly, the phone is a bit thick and heavy. The screen slides up to reveal a keyboard, but the way the keys are recessed between raised areas on either side makes for slightly uncomfortable typing. And while the big touchscreen is nice, you can't resize objects simply by pinching or stretching them with your fingers. Once you get used to this trick on the iPhone, you expect it on every handset.


The Android software is far more interesting than the G1 hardware, in part because the developers tried to tear down the walls that divide applications. Other mobile-phone operating systems get you only some of the way to this goal. On a Windows Mobile handset or an iPhone, if you click on a Web address in an e-mail message, the phone opens a Web page in a browser. Click on a phone number in a Web page, and the phone usually dials it. But a task as simple as copying text from a Web page and pasting it into an e-mail is difficult to impossible on handsets.

Android tries to fix this by organizing activities in terms of users' needs and desires rather than predetermined programs. In a sense you are always in a browser, even when it doesn't look like it. Not surprisingly for a product designed by Google, search is central: If you start typing while browsing the Web or looking at a picture, Android will search the phone contents and the Web based on the text. This instant search could prove to be either extremely helpful or really annoying. I will explore it in a more detailed review of the G1 closer to its launch. One problem with the initial Android release is its Google-centricity. The search, of course, is Google search, and e-mail is optimized for Google's Gmail. The phone pulls contacts from Google Contacts, so you'll need to jump through hoops to keep the phone's contact list in sync with Outlook or the Mac Address Book.
thanks to: economictimes.indiatimes.com